Legislators Prayer for the Press

May God give you the wisdom
To leave out my stumbling words
And just print the upright phrases
That may inspire.

Please God, guide the photographer
Away from my bald spot and
Instead let the camera capture
My pure and resolute heart.

God give me the grace to know
The slant of the liberal or
Right wing media but still
Keep my solid stance.

Even more God, let me not
Take pride in my name in a title
Or picture above the fold
Nor in a thousand “likes”.

God, help me know my speech
Is for this body, my colleagues
Not pandering to the few I know
Attending to the live feed.

16 May 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Legislators Prayer for the Press

Prayer for Parliamentary Procedure

The procedures of the body are governed by the rules of the body (approved by 2/3rds of the body), and when they are unclear, Mason’s Manual. But things go along and most legislators learn from their mistakes, or when something happens that seems out of place. I can remember hearing the Majority Leader ask for the Senate to go “at ease”  hundreds of times, but when I asked for such in my final senate year, I forgot to include in the request that unanimous consent be granted. After, he politely underlined a part of Rule 43: Senate at Ease. — (B) The Senate may be called “at ease” only with consent of the Senate. Rules, words matter.

Please God, forgive my ignorance
Of Senate Rules and Masons Manual
And know I will study and learn
As I should, oh Lord.

Dear God
Do not let my ignorance harm
The work I do for justice
Nor my constituents or
The state I serve.

Dear God
Let the overriding purpose
Be greater than the rules
We all should know and work with
But so often fall short.

Dear God
We know the rules are meant
To preserve my voice, not stifle
Honest meaningful discourse
And should be used as such.

Dear God
Simple rules serve simple goals
And ours here should be simple
Though You know and I know
Many times it is not so.

18 June 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Prayer for Parliamentary Procedure

Prayer for Service

Dear God,
Do I assume all I represent live like me?
Please disabuse me my assumption.

Dear God,
Do I believe my beliefs are common?
Please relieve me of my hubris.

Dear God,
Do I carry my righteousness above others?
Then humble me with yours.

Dear God,
Do I know the suffering of my people?
If not, then afflict me.

Dear God,
Have I taken my position for advantage?
If so, please smite me.

Dear God,
Let me know if there is any good I can do.
For to serve the people I must know You.

22 March 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Prayer for Service

Senate Prayer for the Roll Call Vote

All votes in the Senate are by roll call in alphabetical order. A senator may pass on the first call but must respond by the second. No senator may leave the chamber once a roll call has been started.
Dear God,
Let not the softness of my “Aye”
Nor the harshness of my “Nay”
Hide the shades of gray
I see in a
Binary vote.

Dear God,
Let my resolve not soften
As I listen to debate
But keep me aware
Of my place in space
And time.

Dear God,
Let not the surprising vote
In the early alphabet
Shudder my sense of truth.
Decision is mine alone
For all.

Dear God,
Let me not take comfort
As the count piles high
The side I am on
Or the folly that my vote
Has no meaning.

Dear God,
The roll is the truth telling we
So often avoid; done too often
We may find ease with
The act of judgement
And lose compassion.

20 Feb 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Senate Prayer for the Roll Call Vote

Prayer before Town Hall Meetings

Dear God,
Let me not disparage my opponents
For their position deserves the same respect as mine.

Dear God,
Let me listen to all, those with praise or condemnation
For all voices must be heard.

Dear God,
Let me present my position with justice in my heart
And goodwill to all, so we can all feel a part of this
More perfect Union.

Dear God,
Let me not fear anger or criticism
But instead know peace as the attack comes
And the voters will decide.

Dear God,
Let me be the vessel of the people- all the people
For thy will be done, not mine, not the few,
But the many.

Dear God,
Let me know that the power of representation comes not
From the ability to demonstrate, but the willingness to accept.

Dear God,
Give me the strength and joy to share this great burden
With all those who give it to me to bear.

19 March 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Prayer before Town Hall Meetings

Prayer before the Difficult Vote

It is not widely known that most votes in the Idaho Senate are unanimous, though I had a few 34-1 where I was the one. But the vote total is not what makes a vote difficult, rather the issue can be seen from both sides, or a bill can be constructed with some important action, but some undesired aspect. 

Dear God,
Let not the passion I have, nor the passion of those around me
Sway me from my decision to reflect justice.

Dear God,
Let not the narrow position I defend reduce
The broad sense of justice it defends.

Dear God,
Let me hear the positions of those who will vote
Against me, and in hearing, understand them.

Dear God,
Let my understanding of others broaden my base
To encompass all, yet leave me grounded.

Dear God,
Let me not fear the anger and approbation of the opposition,
For their approval has no weight on the scale of justice.

Dear God,
Let me welcome and cherish the difficult choice,
Unanimous, nay even majority are not the truth.

Dear God,
Let me know when I’ve done my duty to You;
Either side may win, I wish alone to be true.

21 March 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Prayer before the Difficult Vote

Senate Prayer before Debate

The senator who is the floor sponsor usually begins debate after asking for unanimous consent that the complete reading of the bill by the secretary be dispensed with. It is required that all bills be read three times before being voted on, but such formalities are rarely carried through.

The sponsor opens debate, then other senators may debate but Rule 24 must be followed. Debate may either in favor or opposition, and one must vote as one debates. No senator may debate a second time unless all senators have had an opportunity to debate a first time. Then the sponsor is recognized to close debate, getting the final word.

There is indeed formality to the process, but the purpose is to provide order and allow all voices to be heard in a fair and deliberative forum. The President of the Senate (Lieutenant Governor) presides, or the Pro Tem of the Senate in his absence.

Dear God,
Let my words rain down with the power of Your fire
And the substance of Your stones.

Dear God,
Let me open with candor and conviction,
Let my humor deflect and my tone beguile.

Dear God,
Let the words I use strike Old Testament fear in my enemies;
Theirs bones may quake, their arguments melt.

Dear God,
Let me speak with clarity and knowledge and
Let your light shine in my words.

Dear God,
Let those listening know I have Your Spirit in me, then
They have only mortal souls and arguments.

Dear God,
Let my words touch and persuade in this mortal realm,
Since we are all just men of this earth.

Dear God,
Let me know I am right, but also those who oppose
Have words I should hear and appreciate.

Dear God,
Let my closing convey consideration, but conviction of the position
And thus pull those in doubt to the light.

Dear God,
Let me know that words spoken to persuade last no longer
Than the breath exhaled.

Dear God,
Let me know that my person is more than my words,
My deeds more than my position, for to persuade
My mouth and my mind need be grounded.
Let them know my heart,
Let my heart be true.

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Senate Prayer before Debate

Senate Prayer for Personal Peace

Dear God, please hear these words.
Dear God,
Calm my rapid heart,
Driven by desire for things
I should not have
For they do not mean love.

Dear God,
Quiet my rattling brain;
Thoughts drive plans
I should let go
For they do not mean wisdom.

Dear God,

Ease my weary body,
Burdened with injuries
Of intemperate youth,
For this corpse cannot touch eternity.

Dear God,

Hush my childish words,
They are mere animal sounds
Snarls to dominate or scare,
For such effort lies far from the truth.

Only through the peace of knowing you
Can the joy of this world shine through.

16 Feb 2016

Posted in Senate Prayers | Comments Off on Senate Prayer for Personal Peace

Wile E Coyote and Party Loyalty

Photo by Debra Schmidt http://schmidtphotography.smugmug.com/

Photo by Debra Schmidt
http://schmidtphotography.smugmug.com/

Loyalty is a fine quality, but in excess it fills political graveyards.

Neil Kinnock

It has been encouraging to get all the emails, texts, condolence cards, and even phone calls after my election loss. There have been many hands on my shoulder as I’m out at holiday events, “So sorry you lost.” I’m sure my opponent got as many congratulatory ones, at least I hope he did. It was also something to ponder that I got so many messages (email, texts, letters and phone calls) from majority party legislators, active and retired, expressing disappointment in my loss. But at the same time the majority party spent so much effort to unseat me. Indeed, my Senate colleagues contributed significantly to my opponent.

donation

From the Campaign donation information on the Secretary of States website

I was not surprised; they always have, though not always as much. It didn’t hurt so much before because I won, though honestly, I never won by much. My margin has never been more than 800 votes, close to one percent. This is a swing district (there are only three of the 35 legislative districts in this state that have a mixed R/D delegation) and that’s where the parties in this unbalanced state play their power. I am trying to understand the meaning of party loyalty for those of us who have been elected as opposed to our supposed goal of working for the common good. Let me know if this is whining; I hate whining.

The above donation is just from my Senate Republican colleagues. All told, the Republican party  and seated legislators directly contributed over 20% of my opponents fundraising, not including the independent money (?$10,000) they spent. That’s no small effort. One retired Republican legislator told me, “Dan, they just have so much money and there are so few contested races, and so few swing districts, they have to spend it somewhere.” Such doesn’t seem a conservative value, does it?

I can remember a neighbor down on Wildhorse River that told me “the only good coyote was a dead coyote”. He raised sheep, so I understood his sentiment. I imagine the Republican Party in Idaho might say the same about Idaho Democrats. And indeed, Idaho Democrats may have the reciprocal view. Does this partisanship serve our state?

One could discount the public and private sentiments expressed by my colleagues  as just polite condolence, not heart felt. One North Idaho legislator actually argued with me when I said the legislature will do just fine without me. He said he respectfully disagreed; he thought my contribution was going to be sorely missed. I politely did not confront him with this, from his local Republican committee:

new-bitmap-image

So I’m wondering, maybe they did not really consider me worth keeping around, despite their words. Instead the value of having a Republican, any Republican (no matter the character or skills or politics) was worth getting rid of me. That makes me feel pretty special, like Wile E Coyote was special to the Roadrunner. But it sure brings out the cynicism.

If I were to go this route, that is, to decide their words were not genuine, just polite pandering like cocktail party compliments, then the work I did for six years to build relationships and integrity in the legislature is not worth dry spit. And such effort isn’t worth any time for those involved in the legislative process. I find such a bitter conclusion abhorrent, but possible, given the reality of our current political landscape, both in the state Capitol, and maybe in the populace in general. Should we all just play the partisan game, winning and losing? I am guilty of wanting more from all of us.

We could cynically say: it’s just politics. And the party brand is how politics is played: my guy wins, your guy loses. Even more insidious, my Republican colleagues could be trying to distance themselves from the actions of their party. That is, their party makes decisions they would not on their own. So then why are we affiliated? If you look carefully at the beautiful Idaho Capitol, you will find Majority Party and Minority Party caucus rooms build into the structure on opposite sides of the chambers. Was this just a reflection of an historical assumption? Or does this partisan duality serve our state? I’m working on these answers. Let me know what you think.

The presidential election outcome is for me an anomaly in this scenario that provides some small hope. Mr. Trump was not a branded member of the Republican party, though he eventually took over their brand. We’ll see where this re-branding goes. Voters embraced his “maverick” positions and rhetoric even as simplistic, xenophobic, and misogynistic as they were. I don’t think they valued his statesmanship qualities, or his budget details; such does not inflate his media hype. Indeed, many of his supporters knew his promises were empty, and will not hold him to “building a wall”, “locking her up” or “draining the swamp”. But voters in the presidential election wanted to throw out the status quo, and that candidate just happened to be a Republican.  I believe they also wanted to throw out the political party domination of our political process. But Idaho voters wanted their legislature to be more of the same, very one party dominant. Or so they voted. Or did they just carry their anger farther down the ballot?

I am in the process of deciding whether the civic work one does has any bearing on ones value to the civic process, or are we just playing politics? Does the electorate vote on issues, or are we just picking sides? If so, then I believe we have stopped listening to our values and instead voting on our fears. Maybe we in public office have failed to communicate these values. Public servants should foster civic engagement, not pander to fears and promote bias. But then, I loved Wile E Coyote’s innovations, perseverance and grit. But I doubt many would vote for him.

Of course, there could just be the simple truth that I was out of touch with my constituents and did not represent their values, or at least the values of the 50.8% who showed up to vote against me. Indeed, in this election I got more votes than ever before; but still lost. Maybe they just saw me as a no good coyote that needed to go. Beep Beep.

All comments read but not posted.

 

Posted in Idaho Politics, Reflection | Comments Off on Wile E Coyote and Party Loyalty

Abortion at the Door

Some folks would never vote for me. I accepted this. A frequent comment I made: “I might get elected by 51% of the voters, but I represent 100% of the people in my district.” Thus it was hard for me to dismiss my opponents. I thought I should listen to them, even when it was hard; maybe especially then.

The limitations of time for door knocking and the numbers needed to contact imply one should aim for efficiency. If you find out right away a voter opposes you, thank them politely and go on. But the ongoing uncivil presidential race of 2016 was casting a dark shadow over my campaign. And I had listened to a US Senator from our state dismiss the possibility of civil discourse around contentious issues. I thought his stance demeaning of the role we elected officials should serve, and cynical about the possibility of civil discourse in our society. So when I ran into this guy I did my best to listen. Now you get to hear him.

“Hi I’m Dan Schmidt your state senator and I’m out talking to voters about getting reelected.”

“Oh, hi Dan. No, I’ll never vote for you, you’re a Democrat.”

“So party affiliation is important to you?”

“Democrats support abortion. I can’t vote for anybody who thinks it’s ok to kill babies. 26 million babies have been killed by you guys. No, I’ll never vote for you. I saw you as a doctor and I liked you, but you’re a Democrat and you support killing babies.”

This was where I should have politely thanked him and moved on. But I thought he deserved some respect for his honesty.

“I get it that you feel pretty strong about abortion. Are you aware of any of the things I’ve done in the Idaho legislature?”

“No, I’m really not; I don’t pay much attention to the legislature. But you support abortion, you support killing babies, don’t you?”

“I support women having the right to control their own bodies, yes I do.”

“Yeah, that’s what I thought: baby killer. No, I won’t be voting for you.”

“Do you know any women who have had abortions?”

“Yes I do. And I’ve told them they are evil and damned. They just do it for convenience that is all. They kill babies for their own convenience. They are going to hell. They know it too. No, this isn’t something that can be compromised.”

“Not all women make the choice for convenience.”

“Sure they do. I’ve talked with them. They have no consideration for the life they are taking.”

“So you know I am a doctor. I’ve had many conversations with women about this decision and convenience was not usually what we talked about. So I’m hearing you say the state should not allow a woman to control what happens with her body.”

“Of course not. The state should not allow murder. I know you’ll go off on capital punishment now, but these are innocent babies that are being killed.”

“Sometimes these are embryos or fetuses with anomalies that would not survive after birth. Is that murder too?”

“Of course it is. It’s just for their convenience.”

“So I’m hearing that you believe you think you know best what a woman should be doing with her body.”

“Well I know that abortion of any kind should not be legal.”

“So I guess we disagree. I thank you for spending the time you have with me.”

“Yeah, well, you were a good doctor, but I’ll never vote for a Democrat. You guys are baby killers.”

I did then excuse myself and walk away. But just as I believe a woman deserves the respect (right) of controlling her body, and the man at the door thought the unborn deserve the respect (right) of  personhood, I believe civil discourse; honest, respectful conversations are the foundations for our communities, our nation. If we abandon discourse, we move on to violence, the ultimate in disrespect.

I am sure I did not persuade this man to vote for me. But getting votes should not be the ultimate goal of public service. 

All comments are read but not posted.

 

Posted in Idaho Politics | Comments Off on Abortion at the Door