Inspiration

I’m in the back row on the left

I was mostly tired in medical school, not inspired. But I remember one small part of just one of hundreds of lectures and it has stuck with me to this day.

It was the mid 1980’s and Medicare had instituted a plan to control costs in hospitals. The lecturer spoke at length about how health care costs were rising way too fast (forty years ago!) and at one point he paused and looked out at us, the next generation of MD’s for the Pacific Northwest. “You guys can change this,” he said. “Well-trained, hard-working, smart doctors will change this cost growth. We must.” I was inspired.

I resolved to only prescribe medications that offered benefit, only order tests that would benefit outcomes. It’s all in the evidence, and if you know the evidence and make decisions so based, the waste in health care will decrease, right?

Fast forward to a middle-aged Family Doc practicing in a small Idaho town. A retired engineer comes to me for a physical and asks me to order a “stress treadmill test”. He had a heart attack with bypass surgery some ten years before and he wanted to “make sure everything was OK”.

He walked daily, up and down hills, had no symptoms, no chest pain, no ankle swelling, no shortness of breath. He was doing great, just worried.

I explained the best I could to him that a treadmill test was a waste of time, and money. Because of his heart attack, he had an abnormal EKG, so interpreting the treadmill was impossible. If he had any symptoms we should do a different test, but without symptoms, no screening test was indicated at this time.

He was not happy, and the evidence I presented did not comfort him. I failed to gain his confidence. Upon reflection, I also probably didn’t listen well to his concerns, his worry. And that was the symptom I should have addressed.

So, he found a different doctor who would order the test (and charge for it).

That doctor was a partner of mine and he came to me after the test. “Dan, you were right not to order that test,” he said. “But he really wanted it so I did it.” So, I lost a patient, my partner gained one, and the world kept turning.

I think of how we are all talking about the testing, the treatments, the public interventions in response to our current pandemic with Covid 19. Everybody wants a test, but they are fraught with inaccuracy. Our President touts a miracle cure, but there is no evidence to support it. We want to know who is immune, but the research hasn’t been done to show how, or if our bodies’ immune system responds to this virus. We don’t have the knowledge. It’s a great time for opportunists and grifters.

Heart disease (decreased blood flow to heart muscle) was the big killer 50 years ago, and it still is. The research on treatments and prevention had a lot of time to come up with the evidence we needed to make the best recommendations for public health. And believe it or not, we made some headway. But health care costs sure kept climbing.

But most of us aren’t thinking about “public health”, we are thinking about our own mortality, and the health and welfare of the ones we love. Cost is not the concern right now. Not for Congress and our President who just had the treasury print a few trillion dollars. Did you get your check?

We should all listen better to the worries voiced by our neighbors. For those worried about paying rent or buying groceries, printing money and sending checks provides some short-term ease. For those worried about their loss of freedom and independence, maybe giving them a wide berth would provide them comfort. For those worried about their mortality, we might have to share some spiritual strength, if we have any to spare.

Posted in Health Care, Reflection | Comments Off on Inspiration

Don’t Think Like a Virus

Human Population Growth Curve

As the numbers climb in some states and bump up a bit in ours, I thought we should take some time to consider the lowly viral point of view. I’m not here to sell you on “viral rights” or equal opportunity for viruses, none of that usual liberal stuff. But if you put your mind into the viral point of view for a minute, this pandemic might make sense. Or maybe not, since after all viruses don’t think. And that might be our problem.

We think too much. Viruses just want to procreate.

That’s all, their focus is simple: make more of me. Spread my RNA across this planet. But they can’t even think of a planet.

Whatever host that serves will do. It just so happens this virus spent some time in some bats and it made a change that allowed it to find a host that happens to be the most prevalent, wide spread large mammal on our planet. Except maybe rats.

Don’t think we humans are too special. The virus really doesn’t care. Honestly, rats would do just fine too. But this Covid 19 virus got stuck with us humans.

One of the limits to spreading its RNA are its ability to transmit itself from one host to the next. And we sure are a social animal, as much as rats. So, this virus has found a welcome host.

The efforts that have been successful in limiting the spread have been what makes us so frustrated; they are antisocial.

Masks are antisocial.

Staying at home, limiting contact with others has worked. But boy, that ain’t fun, and it sure kills the economy. We don’t think like a virus.

The communities that have had full hospitals and known folks who have died sense the reality of this infection. The less affected communities wonder, “Why all the fuss?”. That’s not viral thinking.

Viruses would find these thoughts a waste of time, since all they want is more of themselves spread all over. Thinking doesn’t help a virus, so they don’t. I’m not sure it’s helping us right now. But we can’t stop ourselves, can we? We are thinking, social animals.

The virus doesn’t really want to kill us. A dead host can’t cough and spread the RNA as effectively. So, all those folks infected but not really too sick, who may not even know they have it are doing the virus a favor. They spread the infection much more effectively. The unlucky ones who have to be hospitalized, isolated, ventilator, aren’t nearly as valuable a viral vector as those out walking around without masks.

We sure have our thoughts about masks, don’t we? Viruses don’t think about masks, just as they don’t think about killing us. But if they could, I’ll bet they’d vote against the masks. They just want to spread. They probably like big gatherings too, if they could like something. They are lucky they adapted to infect a social animal.

One of the gifts this pandemic has given us is a bit of insight into how our neighbors think. We sure don’t think like viruses, and we probably can’t, though we have grown our species on this planet virally. There must be a part of us that has that viral, procreate focus.

It may turn out that how our bodies, how our immune systems react to this virus determines who lives and who dies. The strong, well balanced, healthy immune systems get to work and deal with it like a bad cold. The older, weak ones can’t manage. The over reactive ones suffer too.

This pandemic is an opportunity. It has made me think about the place we humans have on this planet. It has shown me how some of my neighbors think. But a virus wouldn’t care. We should. We shouldn’t think like a virus.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Don’t Think Like a Virus

A Job to do

It will be ten years this summer since Vernon Baker died. His story deserves some retelling.

He entered the Army before the Second World War because he needed a job. He quit as a porter on the railroad because he didn’t want the job of a servant. He was living with his sister and brother-in-law in Wyoming. The first recruiter sent him away; “We don’t have no quarter for you people.” Vernon had heard that often looking for work around Cheyenne. But he persisted and the next recruiter wasn’t put off by the color of his skin.

He rose through the ranks by being responsible and doing the jobs asked of him, though he really wanted to be a supply sergeant. When Pearl Harbor brought war and the Army needed it, he was called on to lead men. In the segregated Army of the time, it was black men he led. Though younger than many he commanded, and smaller, he worked to earn their respect. Though he also took their resentful beatings.

He spent a short time early in the war posted at Fairchild Base outside Spokane and knew then he loved this Inland Northwest part of the states. But he got sent to invade Italy and make history.

Vernon told his life story to Idaho Public Television. The interview can be read online. In his words those brutal days (April 5-6, 1945), it sounded like he just did his job. But when 19 of the 25 men in your platoon are killed around you, and you keep your head and act with courage and discipline, it is remarkable. His actions drew attention from someone, and he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.

Maybe the story should stop there, after all, Vernon went on to be a paratrooper in Korea, then worked for the Red Cross at Fort Ord, California counselling needy families. He got his wish to hunt in this neck of our woods when he came to the Benewah, outside St. Marries Idaho in the late 1980’s.

But some people noticed some funny numbers and were making a fuss. There were 444 Medals of Honor awarded in WWII, and no black soldier had earned such award, despite over 1.3 million serving. In the early 1990’s, the Army listened and asked for a study. They could find no documents showing that race influenced the award, but “a climate of racism prevented recognition of heroic deeds”. The Army decided to award seven Medals of Honor to black servicemen from World War 2, and Vernon Baker was the only surviving one.

In 1997, when the award was fastened around his neck in the Oval Office, he shed a tear. He said he was thinking of all those men up on that hill. A reporter asked him how he felt about serving in a segregated unit. “I was an angry young man. We were all angry. But we had a job to do and we did it.”

And maybe the story should stop there, with a belated Medal of Honor. Vernon returned to the Benewah and hunted in his old but hearty age.

When he started slurring his words, and the brain tumor was found, he got shipped to Seattle for surgery. He recovered some, but the tumor had spread and Vernon died July 2010.

The bills started coming before he died; big ones, really big ones. Vernon had been a healthy spry man and didn’t need doctors much. He had failed to enroll in Medicare or apply for VA benefits. Brain surgery isn’t cheap. The medevac to Seattle alone was $20,000.

Neighbors kicked in, his widow made payments, and now, ten years later that debt has been paid.

Vernon Baker displayed heroism and courage; his “job to do”. May we all have such courage when faced with a job. We have some big ones before us.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Job to do

False Positives

Prototype

The lab in the basement of the Idaho Freedom Foundation was abuzz. The tests were looking good.

“When can we roll this out?” the Lab Director Ben wanted to know.

“It’s ready for beta testing.” Lab Tech Jerry beamed.

“Explain it to me again, like I’m a five-year-old this time. No more of that technical jargon.” The Lab Director knew he’d need to explain this to the Board.

Jerry paused. “Well you see sir, this Covid 19 hoax has gotten everybody aware of the validity of testing, you know, false positives and false negatives.”

“Simpler” Ben interrupted.

Jerry frowned and tapped his lower lip. “Ok sir, how about this? Imagine if we could have a way to know if someone was really a conservative of not. We finally have a test that can prove it.”

“Go on.” Ben smiled a little.

“We’ve had our Freedom Index for years, and it has worked, sort of.” Jerry continued. “We have taken the votes legislators make, multiplied that by the Freedom value of the bill and then scored each legislator.”

“Don’t get too technical about the formula. We just focus on the score, right?”

“Yes, but the scoring has given us some false positives.”

“So, this test is better you say.”

Jerry beamed. “Very much. In the past, legislators would look at the bill score and vote to pad their scores. We were getting a lot of false conservatives mixed in with our true conservatives. This test is much more accurate.”

Ben nodded. He didn’t quite smile. He was thinking of the Power Point he’d have to create to sell this to the board. “OK, Jerry. Now explain how we do this test. Again, keep it simple.”

“Yes sir!” He walked over to the desk top, strewn with screwdrivers and pliers, pieces of wire and rolls of tape, and pulled the sheet off his pride and joy. “Here we have the Con37 analyzer.”

It looked like a modified microwave oven with pair of old rabbit ear antenna sticking on the top. It had wires running to other modules and machines around it on the floor and adjacent tables.

Jerry smiled with pride and patted his creation. “The Con37 analyzes a sample and determines the conservative value with a 98% accuracy.”

Ben frowned again. “Sample?”

Jerry nodded. “It can analyze audio signals, digital, even tissue. Here let me show you.” He flipped a switch and lights came on. There was an irritating buzz that went away when he slapped the side. “First we’ll try the audio spectal analyzer.” He twisted the rabbit ears so they were perpendicular to the Director. “Go ahead, say something. We’ll take a reading.”

Ben looked at the glowing dial on the face of the old microwave. He thought long and hard for something conservative, maybe liberal to test this new-fangled device. Jerry nodded at him with excitement. Ben cleared his throat. “We the people, in order to form a more perfect union, insure domestic tranquility…” He watched the dial barely register as he finished the Preamble.

He frowned.

Jerry said, “Boy, that’s a low score. Try something simpler. Just say ‘Freedom’.”

“Freedom” Ben echoed. The meter pegged. He tried “Liberty”; another high score. “So, it likes simple phrases.”

 Jerry nodded with excitement. “Yes, it knows conservatism in its programming. Let me show you how it analyzes digital content.” He showed how the dials climbed when Rush Limbaugh came through the speakers and dipped when he tuned to NPR. Ben nodded, knowing how this would go with the board.

“How will we analyze candidates for endorsement?”

Jerry got excited. “I would recommend a full spectrum evaluation. We could enter recordings of their speeches, take digital content from their websites, but for the best accuracy we should use the tissue analyzer.”

“Tissue?” Ben asked.

“Yes, we have found conservatives have special tissue markers. We just need a biopsy, just a small piece, then we put it in here.” Jerry swung the oven door open. “We’ve found the accuracy goes way up when the biopsy is more painful.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on False Positives

Defund Health Care

The chant “Defund Police” is bouncing off the walls of the buildings next to many demonstrations. They are protesting an unjust, cruel death of a nonviolent black man under the crushing knee of a white cop, while three other uniformed officers stood by. Indeed, the “defund” idea is gaining traction in some city councils, some state houses and even our nations capital. If “defund” means to fundamentally, even radically change, I suggest we take this step with whatever institution is failing us.

I don’t just chant. When I was an elected Idaho State Senator serving on the budget committee, I proposed defunding a broken part of Idaho government. The Commission on Pardons and Parole had been poorly run for decades and we just kept sending them tax dollars. P&P couldn’t keep data that allowed an analysis of their efforts.  They couldn’t publish minutes of their hearings, as required by law. Idaho had a huge backlog of offenders clogging our prisons. I saw their dysfunction as part of a bigger problem, but I had no doubt they were a problem. So, in my second year on the budget committee, after studying their dysfunction, I proposed sending them $0. I got a couple Republicans to vote with me, but no Democrats.

 When you are on the budget committee, you can either vote to give them money, or not. So, I proposed the sledge hammer because I didn’t have a wrench.

If defunding police will change something that’s broken, I can support it. Honestly, I don’t think the police force in my town is dysfunctional or broken, so I don’t really want Boise or Washington DC “fixing” anything. I trust our local government to do the right thing. If you think somethings broken, get to work on it. Usually, sledgehammers don’t fix things.

But if we are going to look around for broken things, why don’t we turn our gaze on one of our biggest, cruelest institutions: health care.

Do I need to convince you of the cruelty? Do you need the data on bankruptcies? Would a graph on the incessant rise in costs stir your emotions? Should I reiterate how much we spend and how poorly we perform? Does the declining life expectancy in this county motivate you that we need a change?

I don’t have a viral video to galvanize your emotions. Maybe that’s my problem.

The medical industrial complex is a huge part of our economic engine chugging away.  Lots of folks make their living in this sector (including me!), and defunding would greatly disrupt. Maybe we should just take a wrench to it, not a sledgehammer.

And that’s, unfortunately, all the Affordable Care Act was; a crescent wrench compromise with the health care insurance industry. All it accomplished was to slightly decrease health care inflation, decrease the number of folks uninsured, and slightly limit the profits of health insurance companies. The cost curve has not really bent downward, as promised, because the cost containment strategies have been undercut by, guess who: our congress.

It seems the wrenching process can be politically fraught. All a politician has to do is scream “Death Panels” and the crowd starts cheering.

The “Medicare for All” proposal that didn’t carry Bernie or Elizabeth to the Democratic presidential nomination isn’t really a sledgehammer either. It looked more like a hot air balloon and most voters saw it as too big. But the health insurance industry saw it as a five-ton wrecking ball breaking loose from its chain.

The calls to “defund” are cries of outrage, a demand for change. I can understand why folks may be focused on police right now, but the mess of our US health care system needs an overhaul, badly. A crescent wrench won’t do it. And right now, we don’t have the courage for a sledgehammer. What tool do you propose?

Posted in Health Care | Comments Off on Defund Health Care

When Compassion Fails

 It was near the end of my three-year residency. I had gotten up after midnight to admit an elderly woman complaining of headache. The ER had given her large doses of narcotics to help her pain, and they depressed her breathing. All the tests for bad things, blood tests, CT scan were negative. She already took many narcotics and high doses of valium at home prescribed from her regular physician. The ER recognized her as a regular. I came down to examine her in the wee hours, but she was sleeping, hard to arouse on the only occupied bed in the small hospital ER. The ER doc had already slipped off to a nap, but the nurse and the-foot thick medical record told me the story. She lived alone, had been a heavy drinker in the past, but seemed to have quit in recent years with all the prescriptions. She still smoked; her nicotine stained fingers and smoke colored curly forelock confirmed this as she snored on the cot. But her lungs were clear, and as she slept the deep drug-induce sleep her vital signs were normal and her examination, limited as I could do, was normal.

“Don’t wake her,” the ER nurse cautioned. “It’s better she sleeps.” So, I spent an hour reading through the old charts, wrote admission orders, and looked in on her before leaving as the eastern sky lightened. Her creased face and skinny limbs where relaxed, even peaceful, but she woke. I introduced myself and told her I would see her in a couple hours before breakfast on my morning rounds.

I found my resentment building, I could feel it inside. I felt anger at some of the people who needed my help. I had my excuses: the fatigue of long hours for these three years of training, my young wife and daughters who I was called away from to tend these folks. I often judged these folks weren’t “really sick”. I had developed a belief that a “good doctor” didn’t enable unhealthy behaviors. Good care would mean good health. So, someone was to blame here, the doctor, the patient, maybe even the medical industrial system.

I rounded on the woman after my breakfast but before hers. She was sitting up, wanting to smoke, wanting something for her nerves, complaining. The nurse was exasperated. I told them both we would stick with the schedule until her regular physician came by. We had given her so many drugs in the ER, her breathing had almost stopped and we didn’t want her to die.

Her doctor rounded on his lunch hour and I went with him to the bedside. I watched how he listened to her whining and complaints with downward gaze. I found myself wanting to slap the woman, the doctor even. I wanted things to be so different, for them, but probably more for me.

I can’t remember what exactly I did say, but I was unkind. I think I mocked the woman’s complaints of pain, since we were giving her near lethal doses of narcotics, and we could find no cause for this pain. I don’t think I said anything directly to the doctor, but I know I did not respect his treatment, his choices.

I was called into the Residency Directors office a week or two later at the end of a long clinic day. The three years of training were almost over and graduation was near. He showed me the handwritten letter from the woman’s doctor, pointing out my cruelty, my unkindness, my lack of compassion. The Director looked at me, “Dan, you can do better.”

We are now watching compassion fail, in our systems, in our leaders, in ourselves. When compassion fails, there can be excuses and blame. But compassion is a life-long effort we must all work to build within. Though Justice is blind-folded as she lifts the scales of judgement, it is our compassion that gives the judgement meaning. Let us have compassion.

Posted in Reflection | Comments Off on When Compassion Fails

Rotunda Showdown

Not Idaho

It was a sunny May morning in Idaho. The primary election was over and Governor Little was in pretty good spirits. He was looking to back his ¾ ton Ford pickup into a metered space by the Capitol when a Prius with a “COEXIST” bumper sticker slipped in behind and took it. Brad laughed, “Damn Democrats. You won’t be so cocky come November!” he muttered with a smirk. He circled the block.

After plugging the meter, he looked up at the trees, accepting that the starlings would speckle his dusty truck. His mood was coming down. But the sunny stroll buoyed him as he crossed State St. and climbed the steps. A young man stood near the door looking at him, anxious, holding a manila folder. “Can I help you, young man?” Brad offered. He noticed the Idaho Freedom Foundation lapel pin.

“Um, Governor Little?”

“Yes?”
“This is for you. You have been served.”

“Oh Jeez, not another lawsuit.” Brad slapped the folder against his thigh.

The young man blushed and fidgeted. “Um no, Governor Little. This is a summons to a duel.”

“A duel?” Brad slapped his thigh again with the folder and guffawed. “You Freedom Foundation guys don’t like the election results huh?”

The young man’s nervousness eased and he launched into what sounded like a practiced speech. “Under Idaho Territorial law, matters of honor must be addressed between gentlemen when duly served. Chapter 7 Section 33(b). You are hereby notified that the honor of your opponent has been challenged and you are to respond.”

Brad thought quickly. “Didn’t we get rid of that law when we cleaned up all those regulations this last year.”

The young man smiled. “Indeed. You removed the section that repealed this section. The law is restored. You have two days to respond to the challenge. It’s all spelled out for you in the summons.” He gestured to the folder.

Brad couldn’t help laughing. “So, what does Wayne choose for weapons? Sneers at ten paces? He knows I can’t sneer as good as him.”

Here the fidgeting resumed. “It’s all in the summons there Mr. Governor. Honor will be settled. And Mr. Hoffman is serving as the second; he will discuss the weapons, the dueling ground and the time with your second, as is the time-honored custom.” Then he skipped down the steps and trotted off to the west.

Brad took the folder into the marble floored dome and read the contents. Then he headed to the second floor.

He burst through the Attorney General’s office and slapped the folder on the big desk. “What the heck do I do with this?”

AG Lawrence Wasden scanned the one-page piece of paper and blanched. “I was hoping it wouldn’t come to this” he muttered.

“You mean this is legal?” Brad exploded. “How can this be?”

“Well, we did eliminate a lot of stuff last year. It turns out we also got rid of the law repealing the chocolate ordinance, so chocolate is now illegal in Idaho if you can believe it.” Lawrence said amused, then frowned. “My deputy on honor laws just told me about this last week. It sure doesn’t take those Freedom Foundation boys long, does it?”

“But I’m supposed to duel the Lieutenant Governor, Janice McGeachan, not the Freedom Foundation!” 

Wasden frowned, then he hit an intercom button and barked, “Jerry, get in here!” He muttered to Brad as the door burst open, “He’s my honor code deputy.” He handed the paper to the deputy who scanned it.

“Well, Jerry?”

“Oh, there’s a problem with this sir.”

Brad rolled his eyes. “I know that! What do I do?”

“You cannot respond sir. This is an invalid duel summons.”

“Really? I thought dueling in Idaho was now legal.”

Now Jerry fidgeted. “Well, because of the repeal of Chapter 23, Section 3(d), technically it is, but under territorial law, dueling can only be done by men, so this summons is not valid.”

Lawrence put his hand on Brad’s shoulder. “It’s Idaho Brad. It’ll be OK.”

Posted in Idaho Politics | Comments Off on Rotunda Showdown

Health Care Slowdown

Isn’t it ironic that one of the largest economic sectors contributing to the Covid-19 recession is health care? Almost half of the massive first quarter US GDP drop comes from losses in health care spending. Just when the “best health care system in the world” is needed to kick into high gear, to be on its toes, agile, responsive, it slows to half speed. Are you surprised?

Your response to this news might be foretold in your response to the above phrase in quotes:” the best health care system…”. Nearly 70% of Republicans agree with that statement, while only 30% of Democrats do. The partisan divide in this country pivots on just what we expect of health care. We need some alignment of expectations.

Many analysts considered healthcare a “protected sector” in a recession, since they saw demand as inelastic, and funding stable. In the 2008 financial sector driven recession, health care spending stayed pretty constant while people were losing their jobs and homes. Maybe that gave some heath care investors the confidence they needed. Indeed, health care spending in the US has grown to be almost a fifth of our GDP. What bubble?

I doubt many of these analysts had spent a weekend covering the ER in a small Idaho hospital. For every broken hip or heart attack that needed those emergent services, there were ten rashes and colds that could have been treated in the office on Monday, or might have gotten better with some watchful waiting. But the way we have built our health care economy, the way we pay for these sometimes-vital services, requires all those runny noses and worrisome rashes to keep the money flowing so the nurses and doctors will be there when the car crash victim rolls in. With this pandemic isolation, the true elasticity of health care demand has been exposed. Will we go back to the good old days? Do we want to?

The job losses in health care are tragic as are the deaths from this novel virus. But so is wasteful effort. We have an opportunity now to build the system we want. But first, we’ll have to be honest with ourselves about just what we want.

Most people want what they want when they want it, and healthcare is no exception. Politicians know what we Americans want from healthcare. We have had two Presidents in a row promise us just that. Remember Obama: “You can keep your doctor…”? And now Trump: “If you want a test you can get a test…”. Fools love empty promises. Let’s stop being fools.

Hospitals nation-wide are feeling the cash crunch as elective procedures are postponed and emergency rooms waiting rooms are empty. Small hospitals, always closest to the margin are looking at buying red ink by the barrel.

This last weekend, around a fire pit, safely distanced, I heard a novel suggestion from a friend. He and I are in the same high risk, older male age category. He suggested, to save our local, small-town hospital we set up a schedule amongst our similar risk factor friends. Each of us, on separate days would go to the ER and complain of chest pain. We’d get the full-bore treatment, labs, EKG, maybe even spend a night there. The hospital could bill Medicare for our services and the local institution would be saved. We all laughed, even though it’s not really funny.

The years of growth in health care spending in the US has long been held to be unsustainable. The causes, the blame for this predicament are worth understanding if we expect to turn it around.

I sincerely don’t recommend setting up a chest pain schedule with your older buddies to save your local hospital. But I do ask you to start having some considerate conversations about just what healthcare should be in this country. It’s way past time we made the effort.

Posted in Health Care | Comments Off on Health Care Slowdown

Counting Deaths

Monty Python Holy Grail

I have written before about the value of knowing the cause of death to a community. Obituaries used to be reported in the newspaper, not paid personal notes as they are now. The cause of death was usually included in the reporter-written, editor reviewed piece. But the business of reporting the news has changed, and now obituaries, written and paid for by the family, rarely include cause of death.

Then I was referring to the “opioid epidemic”, since the wave of deaths from that cause seemed to sneak up on the general public. I argued before that public awareness of the growing numbers might have raised an alarm and changed some things earlier in that “epidemic”.

But now we are in the middle of a different epidemic, and the number of deaths attributed to Covid-19 are reported daily on the news. But the accuracy, the validity of these numbers is easy to question. We all know the inaccuracy of the testing. Are we undercounting Covid-19 deaths? Probably.

There is a way to get around this issue of squishy test accuracy. It has to do with measuring “excess deaths”. This is calculated by comparing the average number of deaths from all causes in a region for the previous three years to the current reporting period.

The CDC updates this information regularly, but there is a significant lag in reporting time. As of May 11th, the CDC listed 49,000 Covid-19 deaths, while most news reports put the US total at almost 82,000. Currently, according to the CDC, the United States has only 95% of the expected deaths for the period February 1st 2020 through May 9th. No big deal, huh? Don’t forget the lag time.

So, if you don’t have confidence in the accuracy of testing to give the cause of death, “excess deaths” might be a better figure. Maybe it tells you if you are being hit by a train, or just panicking when you hear a whistle. But a long lag time before you respond to a warning whistle can be fatal. Most regions are right near baseline. Idaho has only 16 Covid-19 reported deaths (to date) and our number of total deaths for the period February 1st to may 11th is right at 93% of the previous three-year average.

Further, Idaho has very timely reporting to the CDC. On average, it only takes 8 calendar days from death for Idaho to submit data to the CDC. That ranks us at 10th nationally for how well this small branch (Department of Vital Statistics) of Idaho government is doing its job.

So, what’s the big deal, why not open up the doors of businesses or go to a baseball game? We’re safe here in Idaho, right?

But some states are well above average for this period: New York State at 123% and New York City at 224%.

This sort of comparison has been done for countries too. In almost all cases, the number of excess deaths above baseline is significantly greater than the number of reported deaths from Covid-19. This supports that we just don’t have accurate testing.

Maybe more people are dying for other reasons in this “excess death” category. I have heard it argued by folks wanting to reopen our state that the excess deaths (in other states) could be attributed to people not accessing care due to the shutdown. Many ongoing treatments have been suspended and elective procedures have been postponed. Hospitals are bemoaning this loss of revenue. Health care workers are unemployed. Interesting argument, since I would have thought that most such believers agreed with Raul Labrador’s statement: “Nobody dies from lack of access to healthcare”.

I respect our governor’s caution in response to the train whistle. Some places have been hit by the train. Let’s be safe.

Posted in Health Care, Idaho Politics | Comments Off on Counting Deaths

Response to Protest

“Ohio” CSN&Y

There were pictures of armed protesters in the Michigan state capitol last week. They came to publicly disagree with governor-ordered restrictions on activity in response to the ongoing viral pandemic. No shots were fired, but the internet flamed with outrage. I remember a day when protests were a bit more dangerous.

Please don’t dismiss this old man’s reflections, but protestors got shot in my day. Unarmed protestors on college campuses were fired upon and killed by the state-run “well ordered militia”: The National Guard.

It’s been quite a while since a public protest has been met with such sanctioned violence. I don’t pine for the good old days. But when I looked at the images of the Michigan protesters with their long guns and side arms, I wonder if any would have had a smidgen of recognition if I’d whispered to them “Kent State”.

When the armed protesters wander through the halls of the Idaho Capitol, declaring through public brandishing of a semiauto their “inalienable” Second Amendment rights, I wonder, do they really expect to be fired upon? Maybe they do. Martyrdom can be powerful. It is less so when sought.

Last week, the Idaho Freedom Foundation organized a protest at a closed Meridian playground. They publicized their intent to protest and filmed it. Unfortunately, the woman who got arrested had to beg for the cuffs for a half hour. She only got them when she refused to leave after being politely asked to do so a dozen times. Her attempt at martyrdom was a sham.

I suspect the Freedom Foundation hoped to inspire widespread civil disobedience in response to Governor Little’s stay at home orders. People are frustrated and anxious. But a sham doesn’t inspire. Maybe they were hoping for shots fired.

Maybe Ammon Bundy was also hoping so when he and some followers, also egged on by the Freedom Foundation showed up at the home of the arresting officer that night to protest and deliver a “citizens summons”. They were asked to leave and they did, no casualties, though I’ll bet showing up at the Ammon ranch near Emmett with a citizen’s summons might get you a warning round or two.

No, sanctioned civil violence against our citizens these days isn’t about protests for a cause. You won’t get shot demonstrating against abortion or marching about global warming. The sanctioned violence that occurs today happens at a traffic stop or a response to a domestic violence call, or even when you are called to dispatch your injured bull on the highway, as Jack Yantis experienced in Council, Idaho a few years ago. Police kill us, though not as often as we kill each other. We are an armed, restless populace. And staying at home can make us grumpy, unsociable, maybe even stupid.

The unarmed students that got shot by Ohio State militia at Kent State fifty years ago were protesting what they considered an illegal war, raging in South East Asia. Our government was drafting their colleagues, sending them to kill and die without following the Constitutional requirement that a war can only be declared by an act of congress. Nixon had just expanded the war to invade Cambodia. The students were outraged. They were protesting. And they were fired upon, nine wounded, four killed.

I remember my mother’s reaction to the deaths. I was a junior in high school, wondering about my draft status and the right and wrong of that war across the Pacific. “They deserved it!” she said. “They shouldn’t have been protesting!” I still get fundraising mailers to her from the Republican Party, though she’s been dead 14 years.

I can’t say I ever protested, though I don’t always like what our government is doing. I did run for political office and served. It was the best I could do to fight for justice. Public service isn’t as inspiring as martyrdom, but neither is it a sham; though it can sure feel like it at times. It shouldn’t.

Posted in Idaho Politics, Reflection | Comments Off on Response to Protest